Monday, October 1, 2007

[StemCellInformation] Stem Cell Research - Why Michael J. Fox Is Wrong

Stem Cell Research - Why Michael J. Fox Is Wrong

The fast approaching of the mid term elections bring all the special interest champions out into the limelight. Advocates for special interests ranging from the environment to animal rights all view the political process as a means to advance their causes. Chief among these media darlings dedicated to a social agenda is Michael J. Fox.

Mr. Fox has enabled scientists to carry out some incredible research in regards to Parkinson?s disease (PD). The Michael J. Fox Foundation has awarded more the seventy million dollars in scientific grants involving more than two hundred research projects in eighteen countries.

Among the wide array of projects supported by the Fox Foundation is a gene therapy that injects a virus with a gene produced by the team of Dr. Raymond Bartus into the brain. The theory behind this study is hat seeding the malfunctioning area of the brain will cause it to start producing Dopamine. Dopamine is a hormone like neurotransmitter.

The Cleveland Clinics: Glossary of Parkinson’s disease Terms defines Dopamine as;

A chemical produced by the brain; it assists in the effective transmission of messages from one nerve cell to the next. People with Parkinson’s have decreased amounts of the chemical in the basal ganglia and substantia nigra, two structures located deep in the brain. Dopamine coordinates the actions of movement, balance, and walking.

Another study at the University of Florida supported by the Fox Foundation is led by Dr. Christine Sapienza. This group of scientist are working on curing a symptom of PD, that of difficulty swallowing. This may seem trivial at first blush until you learn that the leading cause of death in a PWP (Person with Parkinson’s) is aspiration pneumonia. Water leaking into the airway causing infection, pneumonia and death.

In Beijing China compounds found in green tea are being study in the event that they may slow the progression of PD. Again supported financially by the Fox Foundation.

Parkinson?s disease is a very highly misunderstood disease. There are an estimated one and a half million people in the United States suffering from PD. It is a degenerative neurological disorder that affects the Dopamine producing area of the brain. This loss of Dopamine can cause at rest tremors, a slowness of movement, rigidity of trunk and limbs and impaired balance. These are only the main symptoms of PD with dozens of secondary symptoms. PD is a quietly devastating disease.

Mr. Fox has joined the political process to promote Stem Cell research, specifically Embryonic Stem Cell Research (ESCR). Mr. Fox and our media have bought into the claims of certain members of the scientific community that embryonic stem cells are the great panacea, the magic bullet, and a cure all solution. Fact is not a single therapy has been developed using Embryonic Stem Cells.

Diana Kapp in The $3 Billion Cell Job states [1] ?Not a single embryonic stem cell has ever been tested in a human being, for any disease.?

Read what she says carefully, not only are their no therapies using ESCR, but no research project has progressed to the stage of testing on humans. This after twenty five years of research and testing on embryonic stem cells obtained from mice.

Stuart Newman, Professor of Cell Biology and Anatomy, New York Medical College wrote [2] ?there had been essentially no progress in curing or even palliating disabling conditions for which mouse ?models? existed, such as diabetes, spinal cord injury, Parkinson?s and so forth.?

No progress towards a cure for diabetes, spinal cord injury or PD, not even to relieving the symptoms of these tragic disabling conditions. Neither a single cure nor relief of the any of the symptoms associated with these diseases.

A leading advocate of ESCR when asked how long it will take for embryonic stem cell based therapies to be ready, gives the following answer [3] ?My answer is five years,? he said. ?It’s the same thing as saying I have no idea.?

That is about as honest an answer as you are likely to find in the debate over ESCR. As honest as it is telling, no one really can say definitively that ESCR will produce a cure in the next several decades, or even if one can be produced.

Quoting Mr. Fox in an interview with Katie Couric on April 16 of 2006 ?not all politicians are on the same page as scientists. Parkinson’s experts believe in stem cell research as a promising prospect for a cure. But the source of those cells ? human embryos â€" touches a sensitive nerve in the nation’s capitol.

Either Mr. Fox is not being entirely truthful or he does not fully comprehend the claims he makes in the above statement. He implies that all scientists are in agreement with his belief that ESCR is the next great cure all. That politicians, specifically those in Washington are to be blamed for its lack of progress.

A case against this point of view can be made from a letter written during the 2004 Presidential election by fifty-seven noted research scientists and physicians. The signatories coming from such renowned research facilities as the Mayo Clinic, Georgetown Medical School, Harvard Medical School, and the National Cancer Institute. In this letter written to the Kerry - Edwards campaign regarding their statements on ESCR; these same scientists accuse the campaign of being irresponsible, dangerous and misleading.

Third, the statements you have made regarding the purported medical applications of embryonic stem cells reach far beyond any credible evidence, ignoring the limited state of our knowledge about embryonic stem cells and the advances in other areas of research that may render use of these cells unnecessary for many applications. To make such exaggerated claims, at this stage of our knowledge, is not only scientifically irresponsible ? it is deceptive and cruel to millions of patients and their families who hope desperately for cures and have come to rely on the scientific community for accurate information. (Ad-hoc group of Scientists Letter to the Kerry ? Edwards Campaign October 27th 2004)

After chastising the political campaign of Kerry-Edwards the letter continues on to describe how research and treatment of non-controversial adult stem cells have already treated and cured thousands of dozens of diseases.

Non-embryonic stem cells have been discovered in many unexpected tissues ? in blood, nerve, fat, skin, muscle, umbilical cord blood, placenta, even dental pulp ? and dozens of studies indicate that they are far more versatile than once thought. Use of these cells poses no serious ethical problem, and may avoid all problems of tissue rejection if stem cells can be obtained from a patient for use in that same patient. Clinical use of non-embryonic stem cells has grown greatly in recent years. In contrast to embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells are in established or experimental use to treat human patients with several dozen conditions, according to the National Institutes of Health and the National Marrow Donor Program (Cong. Record, September 9, 2004, pages H6956-7). They have been or are being assessed in human trials for treatment of spinal cord injury, Parkinson?s disease, stroke, cardiac damage, multiple sclerosis, and so on.

Adult Stem Cells are plentiful, easy to obtain and come with out the moral, ethical and medical baggage of Embryonic Stem Cells. They have and are being used to treat ?several dozen conditions?, currently.

Again we see that the medically more advanced adult stem cells are a superior option to those taken at an embryonic state. This is a scientific fact. The later in the gestation period a cell has achieved the more stable it becomes. Cells taken at the earliest or blastocyst stage (5 to 6 days) are highly volatile, difficult to work with and likely to cause tumors. Later in the development cycle the cell stabilizes and becomes the type of cell it was designed to be.

Mr. Fox is also wrong in his perception of what pro life is and what is not. Again a quote from the Katie Couric interview, Mr. Fox in response to a question about the ?millions of Americans who find the concept of destroying embryos immoral? :

I would say that, from my opinion, it’s an amazing pro-life thing to do to take those cells and to endeavor to improve the lives of millions and billions of people that are alive now and will be alive in the future by coming up with curesâ€"and treatments for diseases.

His concept of pro life and mine vary greatly. The basic premise to his answer is that of the pro abortion movement. The idea that lives at different stages of development are of unequal value and that some stages are of little to no value. Another way of saying the same thing would be that the unborn lack some thing that the new born has acquired. This is the slippery slope we find ourselves on today, and have been treading ever downward since Roe v. Wade.

All life, the stage of development not withstanding is valuable in the eyes of our Creator. The Bible teaches that men and women were created in the image of God

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. Genesis 1:27 (NIV)

Combined with the instruction of the 5th commandment delivered to Moses in Exodus 20:13 “You shall not murder. (NIV)

This makes it imperative that we are to protect life, from its very beginning to its natural end. Life is sacred gift. This truth is unrelated to situation or circumstance. Destroying a human embryo is destroying a living human being. Any middle school biology student know that life beings when the cell divides. ESCR destroys a human being. Michael J. Fox knows this. The scientist proponents of ESCR know this. They have their own reasons for pushing their agenda.

As a fellow PD patient myself, my outlook on life and its sanctity are very different from that of Mr. Fox. I have learned to look for the blessing in all things, even PD. It is the difference between a post modern worldview and a Christian worldview. When one learns that God is sovereign and allows nothing that can not be used to His glory to happen, it gives life a new meaning.

Stem Cell Research can be beneficial to human kind when done properly. It can be extremely destructive when done outside the bounds of propriety. We must put aside our personal agendas and educate one another to the facts. Stem Cell Research on Adult stem cells provides great promise of even more therapies and treatments in the near future.

In conclusion I want to address Mr. Fox directly by saying, Michael you have done great things with your foundation, all in your own strength. However you will never find true happiness or peace until you come to accept Jesus Christ as the Lord of your life. It staggers my imagination what you could accomplish were you only acting in His will and not your own. As the Apostle Paul writing from a Roman prison cell explains it;

I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound. In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need. I can do all things through him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:12-13 (ESV)

I will pray that you God gives you Michael the wisdom to discern the truth regarding the destruction of embryos and the sanctity of human life. That he will soften your heart and that you will choose to let Him in. That you will continue to do His work, His way.
All in the name of Jesus, Amen

[1] Diana Kapp, ?The $3 Billion Cell Job,? San Francisco, January, 2005
[2] Stuart Newman, Professor of Cell Biology and Anatomy, New York Medical College, ?Averting the Clone Age: Prospects and Perils of Human Developmental Manipulation,? J. Contemporary Health Law and Policy,Vol.19:2003, pp.446-447
[3] Jonathan Bor, ?Stem Cells: A Long Road Ahead,? The Baltimore Sun, 3/8/04

Clyde Annach is the operator of the Web Log Aha! Clyde’s been thinking again!

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Y! Messenger

Want a quick chat?

Chat over IM with

group members.

Yahoo! Groups

Get info and support

on Samsung HDTVs

and devices.

Dog Zone

on Yahoo! Groups

Join a Group

all about dogs.

.

__,_._,___

[StemCellInformation] California Offers First Bonds to Individuals To Fund Stem Cell Research

California Offers First Bonds to Individuals To Fund Stem Cell Research

By Kristen Philipkoski EmailSeptember 28, 2007 | 2:10:48 PMCategories: Stem Cell Research  

Cirm
The California state treasury is finally offering up $250 million in bonds after being bogged down with lawsuits since voters approved the stem cell funding measure Proposition 71 in 2004. Individuals, rather than institutional investors, will have first dibs.

Usually, bonds are offered to larger, sophisticated investors because their value is more difficult to track than stocks.  But since the sale will raise money for the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, which is mandated by Proposition 71 to spend $3 billion on stem cell research over the next decade, the state treasury is counting on individuals who are passionate about stem cell research, and possibly less concerned about profit they'll make from their investment, to shell out.

"There probably is a large group of people in California who are philosophically committed to this," Lockyestate treatsurer Bill Lockyer told Reuters.

Individuals can place orders starting October 3, one day before everyone else.


__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! Groups

Your one stop

for beauty & fashion

tips and advice.

Cat Zone

on Yahoo! Groups

Join a Group

all about cats.

HDTV Support

on Yahoo! Groups

Help with Samsung

HDTVs and devices

.

__,_._,___

[StemCellInformation] 372 Monday, October 1, 2007 - MARK PERA, ANNA ESHOO, AND THE PRICE OF POLITICS

Yahoo! Groups

Join a yoga group

and take the stress

out of your life.

.

__,_._,___

[StemCellInformation] Study gives Parkinson's cure hope - BBC News

Last Updated: Monday, 1 October 2007, 20:31 GMT 21:31 UK 0
0
Study gives Parkinson's cure hope

Researchers in Leicester believe they have made a discovery which could lead to a cure for Parkinson's Disease.

BBC News

The degenerative brain disorder currently affects one in 500 people in the UK.

Researchers now believe they have discovered crucial details about why, and who, the disease strikes - although a cure could still be years away.

They have identified how two defective genes interact to destroy cells in the brain, leading to the condition.

Worldwide interest

Dr Miguel Martins said: "We think that our results provide very exciting new findings relating to neurological disorders, in particular Parkinson's Disease.

"We seem to have found a link between two genes that have previously been associated with Parkinson's Disease."

He added: "The future in terms of cures for Parkinson's Disease lies definitely with stem cell technology and therapies as well as gene replacement technology.

The findings from the Leicester study have already attracted interest from the scientific community around the world.

Most sufferers are diagnosed in their sixties although one in 20 are diagnosed before the age of 40.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Y! Messenger

PC-to-PC calls

Call your friends

worldwide - free!

Real Food Group

Share recipes,

restaurant ratings

and favorite meals.

Fashion Groups

on Yahoo! Groups

A great place to

connect and share.

.

__,_._,___

[StemCellInformation] Scientists criticize adult stem cell claim-TheScientist.com

Scientists criticize adult stem cell claim
 
German stem cell researchers say a colleague's claims about an adult stem cell heart therapy are scientifically flawed and politically motivated
 
[Published 24th September 2007 04:10 PM GMT]
 
TheScientist.com
 
Stem cell scientists in Germany are accusing a clinical researcher of making unscientific claims about an adult stem cell transplant therapy in gen research as the country's parliament prepares to debate liberalizing the current stem cell law.

Bodo-Eckehard Strauer, director of cardiology at the University of Düsseldorf, told the daily Rheinische Post (Sept. 15) that his team had saved the life of a 64-year-old man who suffered from cardiogenic shock by transplanting adult autologous bone marrow-derived stem cells into a damaged artery. Strauer described the treatment as a "global innovation" and called for increased funding for adult stem cell research. Strauer has performed the procedure in over 300 patients since 2001, but the case was the first in an acute patient.

But some researchers say his claims go too far. Andreas Zeiher, director of cardiology at the University of Frankfurt and also a bone marrow transplant specialist, noted that patients suffering cardiogenic shock normally have a survival rate of 50 percent, placing into doubt the lifesaving role of Strauer's treatment. "Science is not [done by] reporting a single case," he told The Scientist. "What Strauer has done is to give a patient report, not a scientific study."

Jürgen Hescheler, head of the Institute of Neurophysiology at the University of Cologne, agreed it was not scientifically valid for Strauer to base such bold claims on one patient. Strauer's statements triggered a lot of discussion among Germany's stem cell scientists, he said. "Most people are not happy with what Strauer did."

Hescheler, an outspoken supporter of embryonic stem cell research, believes more animal research is needed to better understand the effect of stem cell injections before such treatments are tried in humans. "There are many possible risks which might happen," he said," "and this applies for all types of stem cells and derivatives."

In a recent mouse study, Hescheler and colleagues identified potential risks of bone marrow transplantation into infracted hearts, showing calcium deposits formed in mice receiving mesenchymal stem cell injections.

Strauer, however, defended the scientific validity of his claims, which he said could now be investigated in a clinical trial. "Every study starts with a first patient," he told The Scientist.

Strauer said he was certain adult stem cell treatment caused the patient's recovery, adding that it is common practice to report such "new and innovative results" to the general press. The case, which occurred this summer, was also reported in the September issue of the Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (German Medical Weekly), a peer reviewed publication.

Strauer's support of adult stem cell research echoes the stance of German Research Minister Annette Schavan. Schavan, who recently announced a three-year €5-million program for adult stem cell research, opposes embryonic stem cell research.

Current law bans production of embryonic stem cells within Germany and allows researchers to import only cell lines produced before January 2002. Many researchers believe the old lines may have genetic defects, said Hescheler, and results from German scientists are often met with skepticism. The possibility of loosening the restrictions will be debated before the Bundestag, Germany's parliament, in the coming weeks, but the details of a new law have not yet been decided.

Hescheler said he believes a more permissive law has a slightly better than even chance of winning Bundestag approval. He said Strauer reported the case study in the media in order to sway public opinion away from the need for a new law. "I think so," he said.

Zeiher would not say directly whether he believed Strauer's comments in the press where politically motivated, but noted that Strauer supports an anti embryonic stem cell group called "Your Stem Cells Heal" and is quoted on the group's Web site promoting adult stem cell therapy. "This tells you everything," Zeiher said.

Zeiher said he was confident that a new, more liberal law will be approved. A Bundestag majority wants Germany to be a leader in science, he said, and access to newer embryonic stem cell lines "is the only way to advance science."

Strauer declined to comment directly to the accusations that his newspaper comments were politically motivated. When asked whether he supports a new embryonic stem cell law, he said, "No. We really don't need a change."

Ned Stafford
mail@the-scientist.com

Links within this article:

J. Burgermeister, "Stem cell standoff in Germany," The Scientist, September 26, 2003.
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/21626/

S. Reker, "Herzinfarkt-Therapie: Durchbruch an Düsseldorfer Uni-Klinik, " Rheinische Post, September 15, 2007.
http://www.rp-online.de/public/article/aktuelles/wissen/gesundheit/480265

I. Oransky, "Trial of the heart," The Scientist, October 1, 2006. http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/24908/

Andreas Zeiher
http://www.kardiologie-uni-frankfurt.de/index.php?hb=home&sb=start

M Brehm and B.E. Strauer, "Reversal of therapy-resistant cardiogenic shock after intracoronary transplantation of adult autologous bone marrow-derived stem cells," Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, September 2007.
http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/17853349'

Jürgen Hescheler
http://www.uni-koeln.de/med-fak/physiologie/np/index.htm

M. Breitbach et al., "Potential risks of bone marrow cell transplantation into infarcted hearts," Blood, August 15, 2007.http://www.the-scientist.com/pubmed/17483296

N. Stafford, "German minister rebukes stem cell research," The Scientist, January 5, 2006.
http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/22923

Your Stem Cells Heal
http://www.deinestammzellenheilen.de/sub_statements.php

__._,_.___
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
SPONSORED LINKS
Real Food Group

on Yahoo! Groups

What does real food

mean to you?

Yahoo! Groups

Join a yoga group

and take the stress

out of your life.

Yahoo! Groups

Beauty & Fashion

Connect & share

tips and advice.

.

__,_._,___

Recent Posts